
A Snow Leopard follow up to this post is here.
A couple of months ago I built a quad-core Mac Pro equivalent “Hackintosh” based on Intel’s X58 and Core i7. All components were selected for their compatibility with Mac OS X Leopard. My goal was to build as close a Mac Pro clone as possible using off the shelf parts, with the ability to do Apple Software Updates on a retail, unmodified OS X installation as you would with a real Mac. First though, a little background…
BIRTH OF A DELLINTOSH
For five years I’ve used a trusty Dell Optiplex GX280. It’s a 3Ghz Pentium 4, Hyper-Threading system. I’ve never had any issues with it which probably had something to do with the fact that I’d stuck with Windows XP Pro throughout and didn’t bother “downgrading” to Windows Vista. From video editing using Sony Vegas to Photoshop usage, the system was rock solid and stable.
Back in August of 2008 I jumped on the Hackintosh bandwagon by installing OS X on it.
To test out whether my Dell works with OS X, I got hold of a bootable, modified installation disc that allowed me to do just that. These Hackintosh distros are dubbed “OSx86″ as they’re patched to work with non-Apple x86-based systems. For instance, Apple uses EFI to boot while non-Apple machines use BIOS, so the distro has to emulate EFI in some way. Additionally, as the kernel provided in OS X only works with a Core/Core 2 CPU, the distro includes a modified kernel that works with a Pentium 4. The distro also includes additional/replacement kernel extensions (kexts) to drive hardware not usually found on Apple systems.
To my surprise, OS X booted up just fine; it even recognized my dual monitor setup. It didn’t identify the on-board Broadcom chipset ethernet, which was easily rectified by using a Realtek chipset ethernet card that I got for around three dinars (eight dollars).
I was even able to edit and render 1080p video using Final Cut Pro without a hitch. It soon became my system of choice and I hardly ever booted XP.
Following that little experiment, I went ahead and installed OS X permanently on my Dell, dual-booting with XP using the Darwin bootloader. Granted, the Dell was only a P 4 system, yet OS X worked smoothly and flawlessly, recognizing the two virtual cores provided by Hyper-Threading. I was even able to edit and render 1080p video using Final Cut Pro without a hitch. It soon became my system of choice and I hardly ever booted XP.
With its Unix base, OS X took me back to the days when computing was fun, when one could dig under the hood and run shell scripts and do all that good geekery. It’s like FreeBSD or GNU/Linux but with popular application support and a great user interface. I was hooked.
OS X has the best of both worlds: like a *nix system, it is rock solid and allows one to easily get under the hood and elegantly script and code for it, all the while having a mature desktop as Windows does.
Prior to the introduction of OS X, I never had the inclination to get a Mac, since the Classic Mac OS (Systems 7-9 having been used by me) seemed rather pedestrian. OS X has the best of both worlds: like a *nix system, it is rock solid and allows one to easily get under the hood and elegantly script and code for it, all the while having a mature desktop as Windows does.
The only snag with my Dell Hackintosh was that I wasn’t able to update easily or without the risk of breaking the system installation. Part of that is due to the fact that I was using a non-vanilla kernel as well as various other kexts in a way that if they were overwritten by the Apple Software Update, it would render my system non-working.
The Hackintosh community did come up with various ways to install system software updates without the risk of breaking an OS X installation, yet by that time I had been using OS X on my Dell for a little over a year and decided its time to finally upgrade my rig.
CLOUDNUMBERNINETOSH: A CORE i7 HACKINTOSH PRO
I thought of buying a Mac Pro. Whether I purchased it locally or had one shipped from the States, the cost would be significantly higher than if I built my own customized Hackintosh Pro system. True, a Mac Pro uses
Instead of a true Mac Pro clone, I’d be creating a sort of “Mac Pro jr.”, a mythical machine that costs a bit more than an iMac but is as fast as a W3520 Xeon-based 2009 Mac Pro, and has expansion potential similar to the Mac Pro.
way more expensive server-class Xeon CPUs instead of the Core i7, comes in a great case and has an unmistakable quality feel to it. Then again, with the right motherboard, the Core i7 has great bang-for-the-buck when overclocked compared to a Xeon. Instead of a true Mac Pro clone, I’d be creating a sort of “Mac Pro jr.”, a mythical machine that costs a bit more than an iMac but is as fast as a W3520 Xeon-based 2009 Mac Pro, and has expansion potential similar to the Mac Pro.
Besides, what’s the fun in buying something pre-built? I’ve built a PC nine years ago and it was great fun, and the thought of doing it again was more tempting than simply walking into the local Apple dealer and handing him a wad of cash for one box. I wanted crates of components and I wanted to build it myself.
THE BUILD
I’ve ordered most components from Amazon.com. I would’ve loved to order from newegg.com, but they were being jacks about accepting my non-US CC and shipping to my Aramex mail-forwarding box.
The table below compares the Mac Pro vis-a-vis my Hackintosh configuration’s components and shipping price. The motherboard of choice is the Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5, which has been shown to work quite well with OS X.
| Item | 2009 W3520 Mac Pro Quad 2.66GHz | Hackintosh Pro 2.66GHz | Hackintosh Pro Item Price (USD) |
| Processor | 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon W3520 | 2.66GHz Intel Quad-Core i7 920 | 289 |
| Memory | 3GB 1066MHz DDR3 ECC SDRAM | 6GB 1600MHz DDR3 (Corsair Dominator) | 312 |
| Hard Drive | 640GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s | 640GB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s | 66 |
| Graphics Card | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB (GT 120 is a rebranded GT 9500) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 9500 1GB +NVIDIA GeForce GT 7600 256Mb
Providing a total of 4 DVI outputs. |
140 |
| Optical Drive | 18x SATA SuperDrive | Samsung 22x SATA SuperDrive | 40 |
| Mouse | Apple Mighty Mouse | Logitech Wireless | 40 |
| Keyboard | Apple Keyboard | Logitech Wireless | 40 |
| Motherboard | Apple Proprietary | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 | 289 |
| PSU | Apple Proprietary | Cooler Master Silent Pro M700 Series Modular 700W | 131 |
| Case | Apple Proprietary | Gigabyte Aurora 3D | 172 |
| Card Reader | None | 5.25″ Multi-Card Reader/Writer | 37 |
| 5.25″ SATA Dock | None | 5.25″ IcyBox SATA slot | 36 |
| CPU Cooler | Apple Proprietary | Noctua NH-U12P SE1366 Silent CPU Cooler | 80 |
| OS X Leopard | Included with Mac Pro | Single-User Retail – Required to be legal! | 99 |
| Shipping and Taxes – New York | USD 41 | - | 106 |
| Aramex Shop & Ship forwarding to Bahrain | USD 401 | 210 | |
| Mac Pro from US (USD) | USD 2,942 | Hackintosh Pro Total (USD) | USD 2,080 |
| Mac Pro from US (BHD) | BHD 1,109 | Hackintosh Pro Total (BHD) | BHD 784 |
| Mac Pro from Apple Center Bahrain (BHD) | BHD 1,220 | ||
| Mac Pro from Apple Center Bahrain (USD) | USD 3,236 |
The table below provides the savings potential from going the Hackintosh route instead of buying a Mac Pro locally in Bahrain or from the US.
| Price Difference | |
| Mac Pro Purchased from US vs Hackintosh Pro | |
| Savings (USD) | USD 862 |
| Savings (BHD) | BHD 325 |
| Savings (%) | 29% |
| Mac Pro Purchased from Bahrain (Apple Center) vs Hackintosh Pro | |
| Savings (USD) | USD 1,156 |
| Savings (BHD) | BHD 436 |
| Savings (%) | 36% |
Note that I could have saved over 44% by settling for less, and slower memory instead of the 6GB 1600MHz Corsair Dominator, and settling for one graphics card instead of two.

INSTALLING OS X LEOPARD
The process of installing a retail copy of OS X is simplified by the wonderful “Standard Retail DVD Install” script and instructions provided by digital_dreamer at InsanelyMac.
Apple Software Updates can be performed safely without the risk of breaking the installation.
This method of installation provides for a completely retail, vanilla install and uses the Chameleon bootloader to load any necessary modifications at boot time, without affecting the original system files and/or structure. This ensures that Apple Software Updates can be performed safely without the risk of breaking the installation. This makes the Hackintosh as good as a real Mac with hassle-free updates.
I also installed Windows 7. I don’t usually boot directly into it (though I can), since I use VMWare Fusion to run it in a virtual machine under OS X. Works like a charm. The same goes for other OSs, including Ubuntu and AROS.
I’m currently using three Dell 20.1″ monitors and running four virtual desktops, each one spanning all three monitors. The following is a screenshot of the setup using Exposé:

Windows 7 is running in a virtual machine on the left screen of the first desktop, while AROS is running in another VM on the middle screen of the lower left desktop. Photoshop, Google Earth, VLC and a host of other programs are running as well. Yes, even when zoomed out in Exposé, the videos, Google Earth’s animation, etc. are playing without a hiccup. Mac OS X is THAT good.
BENCHMARKS: HACKINTOSH PRO FASTER THAN A W3520 XEON-BASED 2009 MAC PRO
Without overclocking the i7 920, I’m pleased to say that the Cloudnumberninetosh is faster than a W3520-based 2009 Mac Pro. It has a Geekbench score of 8667, while average W3520-based 2009 Mac Pro scores are at 8144.
Compare this to my old Dell’s score of 1805!
Having at your disposal four real cores and a total of eight virtual cores (each core is virtualized into two) means that whatever you throw at this rig, it won’t break a sweat.
Once I get around to overclocking this beast, I’ll update this section. Based on the experience of others with a similar setup, I can easily get a score of 12,000+ with a 3.6-3.8GHz overclock.
Having at your disposal four real cores and a total of eight virtual cores (each core is virtualized into two) means that whatever you throw at this rig, it won’t break a sweat.
CONCLUSION
Is it worth it? Absolutely. If you’re willing to spare the time and don’t have the need for all the other additions/advantages that a Mac Pro provides, then this is a great way to get a machine which is super-fast and expandable while remaining only slightly more expensive than a high end dual-core iMac (even if you add 100 dinars or so for a decent monitor) and cheaper than a Mac Pro.
Besides, if you’re a Windows gamer, the motherboard comes with three NVidia SLI and ATI CrossFireX PCI Express slots which you can take advantage of for connecting up to three same-model graphics cards to get higher frame rates. SLI and CrossFire is not available on the Mac Pros and is not supported by Leopard, though on a Hackintosh such as the Cloudnumberninetosh you may keep the cards bridged as it won’t affect the operation of OS X. When using Windows, you can turn on SLI/CrossFire for certain games to get higher frame rates.

Note: In no way do I condone software piracy. Having installed OS X on three machines to date, I did buy a brand new, shrink-wrapped OS X Retail Family Pack from eBay for US$149 (a bargain multi-license if you compare it to other software), which gives me a license for up to five installations. I know Apple’s end-user license agreement (EULA) states that OS X should not be installed on ” non Apple-labeled” machines. That is subject to interpretation. Apple-labeled could well mean slapping an Apple sticker on the machine (which is what I did). Besides, in some jurisdictions post-purchase agreements such as EULAs are not valid. I’m not sure what Bahraini law’s take on that, though I doubt it’s advanced enough to deal with such issues.
Don’t ask me for copies of OS X! You can get your own single-license copy from amazon.com for around USD 99.


#1 by hisham on January 13th, 2010
Quote
@osxgeek
There are certain options you’ve got to set in BIOS to permit the proper running of OS X. These sometimes may be things such as disabling certain drive interfaces, etc. This will not harm your computer at all.
The DSDT patch does not modify your BIOS or any other hardware. What it does is that it reads your BIOS’s DSDT, then creates a DSDT patch file that is then modified so that it can be used to override OS X reading the “incorrect” DSDT from the BIOS. The override is done in your bootloader, such as Chameleon. More info here.
As for changing clock rates, etc, that’s delving into the fine art of overclocking, in which you have to research the potential of your own board, CPU and memory before committing any changes to BIOS. This has absolutely nothing to do with installing OS X. It’s simply an option you have for running your machine faster. If you’re not careful and lack adequate cooling, it may cause problems or could even damage your hardware. Always tread carefully and read the experiences of others. I have posted my own experience in this blog with the GA-EX58-UD5, which is very good at safe overclocking when combined with an i7 920 CPU.
@Nick
Hey Nick. Loved Japan, been there back in 2008! Akihabara FTW!
I’ve got three of my monitors (21″) connected at 1600×1200, and the fourth, an 18″, at 1366×768.
As for sound, I’m using purely USB-based sound hardware. The speakers are USB and so is my microphone (it’s part of my USB camera). However, I do believe all other sound options are working correctly as everything is showing in the Sound preferences; even though I didn’t have a chance to try them out.
The SPDIF optical out is lighted red; so it should be alive, and is showing in the Sound preferences as Digital Out. The other output options showing are Internal Speakers, 2x Line Outs, and of course my Logitech USB speakers. The input options showing are Internal microphone, Line In, Digital In, and my USB microphone.
@loupop
You should be able to use many of the PCI or USB wi-fi modules out there (as long as they’re not Intel wi-fi chipset based). See a list of tested ones here for 10.6.2.
@Kyle
Motherboard: I’m not familiar with the motherboard you’ve selected, but I take it you’ve done the research to know that it’s compatible enough with OS X :) A cursory search reveals that it’s quite popular for running OS X, just like the Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5.
CPU: Perfect. I wouldn’t go for anything faster at this stage, especially since this processor is very overclockable.
Video: I suppose it would work from what I’ve seen. I don’t have experience with ATI cards on Hackintoshes. Always a good thing to have a return/refund policy at hand when buying.
Memory: I would go for something a bit faster than what stock Mac Pros come with, e.g. 1600MHz.
Drives: I’m assuming here you’re referring to Apple’s SoftRAID as provided in Disk Utility, since I haven’t heard of someone successfully using on-board hardware RAID with OS X, yet.
Case+PSU: Seems fine to me.
Blu-Ray: OS X doesn’t support playback of Blu-Ray movies. You can always rip them in Windows and play them back in OS X. See here.
DVD Drive: Does the job.
OS: Snow Leopard rocks. Will do absolute justice to your souped-up hardware rig. As for Windows 7, well, I’ve been evaluating it so far on my setup, and it’s still Windows. Lags pop in out of nowhere and you still have annoying forced shutdowns for updates. Don’t get me wrong, it’s good to have Windows around, especially as a reminder of how much OS X is smoother, slicker and better (though I have to admit the Aero Snap windows resize management is quite intuitive and slick).
Good luck!
#2 by loupop on January 13th, 2010
Quote
thanks for your reply!!
#3 by Kyle on January 13th, 2010
Quote
Thanks for the reply! I have a few programs that I need to run windows for and I sort of like to have windows and I think Windows 7 is fairly decent as far as i’ve seen so far. As for the memory and video card what would you suggest I go for? Do two graphics cards boost the performance significantly? Just wondering what you would suggest for both video cards and memory. I don’t want to spend like 500 for one video card but I don’t want a cheap one either and I want it to be compatible with OS X and be useful for the next few years.
#4 by hisham on January 14th, 2010
Quote
@Kyle
I’ve had great success with a variety of NVidia cards, including PCI-Express, AGP and even PCI ones.
Having two graphics cards will not boost performance under OS X. Though you will be boosting productivity as you’ll be taking advantage of a multi-monitor setup.
Under Windows, you could have two or three of the same card bridged under an SLI (NVidia) or Crossfire (ATI) configuration. Though that’s mainly used for games and the output will be directed to one monitor when turning SLI or Crossfire on.
I’m more of a Photoshop and Final Cut Pro user. I don’t do any heavy gaming or real-time 3D simulations, so when it comes to selecting a card, a cheap and cheerful NVidia GT 7600 and a GT 9500 are perfect for running all my four monitors.
For OS X, I wouldn’t suggest getting anything above 512Mb at the moment. It’s just hardly going to be used. Though 1Gb are now becoming the norm and you’ll probably end up with one of those as a minimum.
As for system memory, I’m quite happy with my Corsair Dominator 1600Mhz. They look wicked cool too if you’re going to plexiglass your case.
#5 by Kyle on January 14th, 2010
Quote
I decided on this for my video card: EVGA 01G-P3-1180-AR GeForce GTX 285 1GB 512-bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card. Do you think it would be better to get two 512Mb cards now instead of that one, and then upgrade later on when 1GB is more supported in OS X. I am only going to have two monitors at max right now though. So I wouldn’t need the extra ports for monitors, but if I could save money without losing too much performance from the computer then I would. I play some games but mainly use it for Final Cut Pro work and for photos in both Aperture and iPhoto and the occasional Photoshop. I also decided on the Corsair Dominator 1600Mhz memory.
#6 by hisham on January 16th, 2010
Quote
For me, since I have four monitors anyway, I would get two low-end 512Mb cards instead. In your situation, I would just go ahead and get the GTX 285 1Gb as I would be using two monitors and the extra performance and memory would not go amiss when gaming on Windows.
By the time you’re fed up with two monitors, the prices of both the GTX 285 and any third and fourth monitors would most likely drop.
#7 by Loupi on January 21st, 2010
Quote
HEllo!
i was wondering if you got sleep to work properly?
i have read 1000’s of post on cards.. i am confuse on what to use… i want something easy to install but with great graphic for gaming…i am not interested in running window whatsoever.
any help from anyone that knows would be great. seams like (for example) ati 4870 from one brand to another is different, some have success , other cant make it work.
i am confuse.
cheers!!
Loupi
#8 by Khaled Al-Berk on January 24th, 2010
Quote
Hi. I’m trying to install the Mac OS X Snow Leopard but have no experiance in this. Can you help me in installing the Mac for my laptop HP 8510w?
Thanks
#9 by hisham on January 24th, 2010
Quote
@Loupi
I can only vouch for the video cards I’m using (e.g. the NVidia GT 9500 and 9600). Sometimes it’s not a sure shoot when you’re buying, so it’s a good idea to keep the receipts and to have a good refund/exchange policy. Otherwise eBay is your next best friend.
I would suggest to always use EFI strings to get the best possible recognition of your card(s). I’ve got my two cards defined in the device-properties key in my boot.plist file.
As far as system sleep is concerned, I’ve had issues with 10.6.2. On wake up, the system is up and running but the monitors remain off. It seems that they’re not being sent a signal to wake up. Hopefully this issue will be resolved soon. If I find a solution, I’ll post it up here.
Frankly, I don’t really use sleep that much (goes for real life as well!), so it doesn’t bother me much.
@Khaled
Sure thing. Please ask any questions publicly so that others may benefit.
For the HP 8510W, a quick search reveals that OS X is quite workable on it. Take a look here for a start.
#10 by James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil on January 28th, 2010
Quote
It seems more and more people are going the Hackintosh route. There is a computer store a couple of blocks from me here that is selling them. They will either convert a PC you already have (if compatible) or build one for you.
I already have a 20″ 2.66 GHz iMac, but when I’m ready to replace it, I’ll sure pay them a visit. They even deliver!
#11 by Hannes on January 28th, 2010
Quote
Hi,
You’re enthusiasm was quite an inspiration for eventually doing the hackintosh! So I more or less mirrored your setup just few small changes/alternations. It’d be great to get your opinion about the following:
1. I ‘d love to get a Sparkle 9800GT 512MB instead of your 9500 GT, hardly be any different I assume, no?
2. Using a Corsair VX550W PSU instead of your 750W PSU, will it be sufficient?
3. Last but not least I consider to skip the CPU Cooler alltogether, It’s the boxed version of the CPU, that’s why… Is that a stupid idea?
Hey, I’d really appreciate a short feedback. Thanks for your help till here!
Best, Hannes
#12 by hisham on January 29th, 2010
Quote
@ Hannes
1. It should work fine.
2. Probably. I only got it to cover the need for power if I put in a third video card. I think my rig would work fine with 550W.
3. As long as you’re not going to overclock, the stock Intel CPU cooler that comes with the i7 should provide sufficient cooling.
Good luck!
#13 by Umberto on February 3rd, 2010
Quote
Great site and tech specs on the new system. Would love to get an i7 OSx86 machine up and running at some point. Question… I too have a few GX280’s laying around mostly running XP now. What 10.5.x distro (as well as your specific selections during install) did you use to install successfully on that hardware? I have tried a few but to no avail. Keep getting panic screens. Also, looks like you opted for 12GB DDR3. I did not find that on the Amazon site for that price so it looks like you got a really good deal.
#14 by hisham on February 3rd, 2010
Quote
Thanks.
On the GX280 I tried Kalyway 10.5.1 and iAKTOS 10.5.1, both worked fine from the get go. Concerning specific selections, from what I recall it was a non-vanilla kernel and NVInject (since I had an NVidia card installed in my GX280).
Thanks for the heads up on the memory. I’ve goofed up and mentioned the price for 6Gb instead of 12Gb. Corrected now to reflect my original build of 6Gb. I added another 6Gb within a few days time of building the system. In all practicality, I am yet to see my memory usage go above 4.8/5.0GB and that’s with Snow Leopard and a few 64-bit programs running as well.
#15 by Umberto on February 3rd, 2010
Quote
Had not tried either of those but will now. Was working with iPC and some other distro that was a derivative iDeneb. My systems are all standard 3Ghz tower models. All have 4GB ram and the standard 80GB drive with the Intel 915G Express chipset, Broadcom 57xx nic, etc… On the memory that you got… I see that there are cheaper options out there for that MB. What is your opinion on noticeable gains from using that particular memory vs something a little less expensive? Thanks again!
#16 by hisham on February 8th, 2010
Quote
Regarding memory, I wanted something with a little bit more kick than the usual Mac Pro offering. As far as performance is concerned, I would not think there’s much of a noticeable difference between 1333Mhz and 1600Mhz memory in day to day use, though I might be wrong. If anyone has any Geekbench scores, let them out!